Deep Learning Techniques for Predicting Data Warehouse Performance Bottlenecks

Pramod Raja Konda

Abstract


Modern organizations rely heavily on data warehouses to support business intelligence, reporting, and advanced analytics. As data volumes, user concurrency, and query complexity grow, maintaining consistent performance becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional performance monitoring approaches—based on threshold rules, manual tuning, and periodic reports—are often reactive, identifying bottlenecks only after system degradation has already impacted users. This paper explores deep learning–based techniques for proactively predicting performance bottlenecks in data warehouses, such as slow-running queries, resource saturation (CPU, memory, I/O), and contention on key tables or indexes. We propose a framework that collects rich operational telemetry (query logs, execution plans, resource metrics, workload characteristics), transforms it into feature representations, and trains deep learning models (LSTM, CNN, hybrid models, and autoencoders) to forecast performance anomalies before they occur. A detailed methodology is presented, including data preprocessing, feature engineering, model architectures, training strategies, and evaluation metrics. A case study on a simulated enterprise data warehouse workload demonstrates how the proposed deep learning models can predict potential bottlenecks with high accuracy, enabling proactive scaling, workload reshaping, or query optimization. The results highlight that deep learning techniques significantly outperform traditional rule-based and simple statistical approaches, especially under complex, highly concurrent workloads.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Breß, S., et al. (2017). Automatic workload management in data warehouse systems. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 10(12), 2001–2012.

Chen, Y., et al. (2018). Machine learning-based prediction of query performance in distributed databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 30(5), 833–846.

Dean, J., & Barroso, L. A. (2013). The tail at scale. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 74–80.

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

Miao, H., et al. (2017). Towards predictive performance modeling of query processing in the cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, 143–152.

Mishra, C., & Koudas, N. (2009). Interactive query refinement. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 895–908.

Tang, L., & Xu, J. (2016). Anomaly detection in cloud service performance using autoencoders. International Journal of Cloud Computing, 5(3), 203–218.

Wen, J.-R., et al. (2019). Time-series anomaly detection for IT operations using deep learning. Journal of Systems and Software, 151, 69–80.

Zhang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2016). Resource prediction and dynamic allocation using recurrent neural networks in cloud environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 60, 49–59.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.