Understanding the Role of Social Influence on Consumer Trust in Adopting AI Tools
Abstract
Nowadays, technologies like AI are increasing and changing quickly, and others are becoming more difficult in common spaces. Consumer trusts very heavily influence its capabilities. So, in this research study, we use the multi-model methods of compliance and identifying internalization, with the help of developing a framework for understanding social media influence theory and exploring the relationship between them. We investigate with Ai-Tools technologies and get the Secondary dataset of questioner-based records from interviews. We identify the relationship between consumer trust in social media influence and AI-adopted tech. We implemented the thematic analysis to apply the PLS-SEM algorithm in our research to highlight relations and consumers' trust in AI tools and explored their communications with ethical trust concerns for building trust. The developer and marketer quickly adopted these technologies to classify their consumer understanding and interaction b/w social influences in AI tools, and this research is most beneficial in the future to rely on the developing strategies.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hasija, A. and Esper, T.L., 2022. In artificial intelligence (AI) we trust: A qualitative investigation of AI technology acceptance. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(3), pp.388-412.
Pitardi, V. and Marriott, H.R., 2021. Alexa, she's not human but Unveiling the drivers of consumers' trust in voice‐based artificial intelligence. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), pp.626-642.
M. Cheng, X. Li, and J. Xu, “Promoting healthcare workers’ adoption intention of artificial-intelligence-assisted diagnosis and treatment: The chain mediation of social influence and Human–Computer trust,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013311.
Jain, R., Garg, N. and Khera, SN, 2022. Adoption of AI-enabled tools in social development organizations in India: An extension of UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.893691.
S. Sands, C. Campbell, K. Plangger, and C. Ferraro, “Unreal influence: Leveraging AI in influencer marketing,” European Journal of Marketing, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-12-2019-0949.
J. Kim, M. Giroux, and J. C. Lee, “When do you trust AI? The effect of number presentation detail on consumer trust and acceptance of AI recommendations,” Psychology and Marketing, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21498.
Atwal, G. and Bryson, D., 2021. Antecedents of intention to adopt artificial intelligence services by consumers in personal financial investing. Strategic Change, 30(3), pp.293-298.
Bianco, M., 2021. Overcoming the social barriers of AI adoption (Doctoral dissertation, Masters Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology] https://research. tue. nl/en/studentTheses/overcoming-the-social-barriers-of-ai-adoption).
Venkatesh, V., 2022. Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), pp.641-652.
Sharma, S., Islam, N., Singh, G. and Dhir, A., 2022. Why do retail customers adopt artificial intelligence (AI) based autonomous decision-making systems?. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
T. Nazaretsky, M. Ariely, M. Cukurova, and G. Alexandron, “Teachers’ trust in ¡scp¿AI¡/Scp¿‐powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232.
Chandra, S., Srivastava, S.C. and Theng, Y.L., 2010. Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis. Communications of the association for information systems, 27(1), p.29.
M. Arnold et al., “FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier’s declarations of conformity,” Ibm Journal of Research and Development, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1147/jrd.2019.2942288.
Sidlauskiene, J., 2022. What drives consumers' decisions to use intelligent agent technologies? A systematic review. Journal of internet commerce, 21(4), pp.438-475.
Beyari, H. and Garamoun, H., 2022. The effect of artificial intelligence on end-user online purchasing decisions: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Sustainability, 14(15), p.9637.
Fernandes, T. and Oliveira, E., 2021. Understanding consumers' acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption. Journal of Business Research, 122, pp.180-191.
Mostafa, R.B. and Kasamani, T., 2022. Antecedents and consequences of chatbot initial trust. European journal of marketing, 56(6), pp.1748-1771.
Graf-Vlachy, L., Buhtz, K. and König, A., 2018. Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward. Management Review Quarterly, 68, pp.37-76.
Vannoy, S.A. and Palvia, P., 2010. The social influence model of technology adoption. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), pp.149-153.
Das, S., Kramer, A.D., Dabbish, L.A. and Hong, J.I., 2015, February. The role of social influence in security feature adoption. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1416-1426).
Homburg, C., Wieseke, J. and Kuehnl, C., 2010. Social influence on salespeople's adoption of sales technology: a multilevel analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, pp.159-168.
Kulviwat, S., Bruner II, G.C. and Al-Shuridah, O., 2009. The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business research, 62(7), pp.706-712.
Pentina, I., Koh, A.C. and Le, T.T., 2012. Adoption of social networks marketing by SMEs: Exploring the role of social influences and experience in technology acceptance. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 7(1), pp.65-82.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Sustainable Development in Computing Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Journal